Bearcountry:

Omeletpants:

Garrett is the King of Garbage Time.

Omelet nailed it.
Ypc look great with a couple runs in garbage time when the other team is beat down at the end of the game and playing to stop big passes.
Forte's numbers would probably look better if we didn't take him out when the defense is tiring and in prevent mode.

If you think that defenses are "playing to stop big passes" at the end of the game when they are losing, then you truly no nothing about football.

---

Bearcountry:

Omeletpants:

Garrett is the King of Garbage Time.

Omelet nailed it.
Ypc look great with a couple runs in garbage time when the other team is beat down at the end of the game and playing to stop big passes.
Forte's numbers would probably look better if we didn't take him out when the defense is tiring and in prevent mode.

So many excuses for Forte.  If you don't think Wolfe's stats should be accounted for, then what do you think about Forte's touchdown against Detroit?  It was at then end of the game and we were up by a couple of scores so don't you think that should be taken away?  Stats are stats.  The Browns were not puposely trying to let Wolfe score and they were playing the run, Wolfe also had no hole and still had a 35 yard run.

jessejames33:

Bearcountry:

Omeletpants:

Garrett is the King of Garbage Time.

Omelet nailed it.
Ypc look great with a couple runs in garbage time when the other team is beat down at the end of the game and playing to stop big passes.
Forte's numbers would probably look better if we didn't take him out when the defense is tiring and in prevent mode.

If you think that defenses are "playing to stop big passes" at the end of the game when they are losing, then you truly no nothing about football.

HA HA NICE!  Yes they know the Bears are going to run so they play the prevent ha ha!  l m a o.  Good post.

DaBears253313:

jessejames33:

Bearcountry:

Omeletpants:

Garrett is the King of Garbage Time.

Omelet nailed it.
Ypc look great with a couple runs in garbage time when the other team is beat down at the end of the game and playing to stop big passes.
Forte's numbers would probably look better if we didn't take him out when the defense is tiring and in prevent mode.

If you think that defenses are "playing to stop big passes" at the end of the game when they are losing, then you truly no nothing about football.

HA HA NICE!  Yes they know the Bears are going to run so they play the prevent ha ha!  l m a o.  Good post.

Thanks.

I just watched the highlight again.  There were 9 guys in the box.  NINE.  There was no hole, and Wolfe still ran for 35 yards.

9 guys in the box all attacking the line of scrimmage is apparently the new "prevent" defense. 

---

jessejames33:

DaBears253313:

jessejames33:

Bearcountry:

Omeletpants:

Garrett is the King of Garbage Time.

Omelet nailed it.
Ypc look great with a couple runs in garbage time when the other team is beat down at the end of the game and playing to stop big passes.
Forte's numbers would probably look better if we didn't take him out when the defense is tiring and in prevent mode.

If you think that defenses are "playing to stop big passes" at the end of the game when they are losing, then you truly no nothing about football.

HA HA NICE!  Yes they know the Bears are going to run so they play the prevent ha ha!  l m a o.  Good post.

Thanks.

I just watched the highlight again.  There were 9 guys in the box.  NINE.  There was no hole, and Wolfe still ran for 35 yards.

9 guys in the box all attacking the line of scrimmage is apparently the new "prevent" defense. 

Ha ha.  When there is no hole Wolfe makes something out of nothing just like on that 35 yard run there was no hole and he bounced to the outside.  He makes guys miss too.  When there are holes, he hits them right away, something Forte does not do.

jessejames33:

Bearcountry:

Omeletpants:

Garrett is the King of Garbage Time.

Omelet nailed it.
Ypc look great with a couple runs in garbage time when the other team is beat down at the end of the game and playing to stop big passes.
Forte's numbers would probably look better if we didn't take him out when the defense is tiring and in prevent mode.

If you think that defenses are "playing to stop big passes" at the end of the game when they are losing, then you truly no nothing about football.

I thought every fan understood running out the clock.

Bearcountry thinks teams go into "prevent defense" when the offense is running out the clock? Yikes!

Omelet thinks it's easier to run when the defense knows it's coming?

It is amazing how uninformed some guys are here.

Anyway the GW haters should try to understand that nobody is suggestion benching Forte. Just split carries the way most teams do. I think both backs and the team would benefit.

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

---

We knew ... in that huddle ... there was a group ... destined ... to apply the kind of pressure ... that had not been seen before." ...

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

traderumorfromcubs.com:

Wolfe is now averaging 5.5 yards per carry on the season and the Bears are still giving about 80% of the rushing carries to Matt Forte who couldn't even average 4 yards per carry against the Browns. Is it time to at least go from 80-20 to 65-35?

wolfe would beast it up if we gave him more carries to the outside

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!! they allow an average of 170 yrds on the ground a game

---

We knew ... in that huddle ... there was a group ... destined ... to apply the kind of pressure ... that had not been seen before." ...

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 32nd in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

---

We knew ... in that huddle ... there was a group ... destined ... to apply the kind of pressure ... that had not been seen before." ...

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Savior? Who said savior? I said more carries. You are arguing against a point that no one has made.

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Savior? Who said savior? I said more carries. You are arguing against a point that no one has made.

this is like the 9000th thread someone has made about Wolfe should be our starter, Wolfe needs more carries, Wolfe averages so many yrds a carry... yada yada yada,WHO CARES! we need to concentrate on the things that matter like our disgraceful OL, and protecting our QB. not about some half pint who can barely get out of his own way

---

We knew ... in that huddle ... there was a group ... destined ... to apply the kind of pressure ... that had not been seen before." ...

number51:

jessejames33:

Bearcountry:

Omeletpants:

Garrett is the King of Garbage Time.

Omelet nailed it.
Ypc look great with a couple runs in garbage time when the other team is beat down at the end of the game and playing to stop big passes.
Forte's numbers would probably look better if we didn't take him out when the defense is tiring and in prevent mode.

If you think that defenses are "playing to stop big passes" at the end of the game when they are losing, then you truly no nothing about football.

I thought every fan understood running out the clock.

Bearcountry thinks teams go into "prevent defense" when the offense is running out the clock? Yikes!

Omelet thinks it's easier to run when the defense knows it's coming?

When did I say that, Einstein?

---

Godfather, Left Tackle Mafia

Just say "no" to midgets.

---

Godfather, Left Tackle Mafia

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Savior? Who said savior? I said more carries. You are arguing against a point that no one has made.

this is like the 9000th thread someone has made about Wolfe should be our starter, Wolfe needs more carries, Wolfe averages so many yrds a carry... yada yada yada,WHO CARES! we need to concentrate on the things that matter like our disgraceful OL, and protecting our QB. not about some half pint who can barely get out of his own way

Our offense would benefit greatly from Wolfe getting more carries.  Just get over it.  Wolfe is a good back; now suck it up, be a man, and admit it!  My goodness you act like you personally dislike the guy; he has done nothing wrong and has been a great asset to the team. 

 

---

'Peace if Possible; Truth at ALL COSTS'

Omeletpants:

Just say "no" to midgets.

insightful as always.

---

'Peace if Possible; Truth at ALL COSTS'

Timothy 2:4:

Omeletpants:

Just say "no" to midgets.

insightful as always.

Thanks

---

Godfather, Left Tackle Mafia

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Savior? Who said savior? I said more carries. You are arguing against a point that no one has made.

this is like the 9000th thread someone has made about Wolfe should be our starter, Wolfe needs more carries, Wolfe averages so many yrds a carry... yada yada yada,WHO CARES! we need to concentrate on the things that matter like our disgraceful OL, and protecting our QB. not about some half pint who can barely get out of his own way

So who said Wolfe should start?  And in case you haven't noticed, we're fans - we don't control who plays, whether we concentrate on it or not.  And what do we do about the O-line?  Can we do anything?  Anybody sitting on the bench we can put in?  Maybe a tight end we can have in there that actually blocks? This has been rehashed repeatedly too on many threads.  Try reading those instead of Wolfe threads. Omelet?  Is that you?

who me?

---

We knew ... in that huddle ... there was a group ... destined ... to apply the kind of pressure ... that had not been seen before." ...

niu007:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Savior? Who said savior? I said more carries. You are arguing against a point that no one has made.

this is like the 9000th thread someone has made about Wolfe should be our starter, Wolfe needs more carries, Wolfe averages so many yrds a carry... yada yada yada,WHO CARES! we need to concentrate on the things that matter like our disgraceful OL, and protecting our QB. not about some half pint who can barely get out of his own way

So who said Wolfe should start?  And in case you haven't noticed, we're fans - we don't control who plays, whether we concentrate on it or not.  And what do we do about the O-line?  Can we do anything?  Anybody sitting on the bench we can put in?  Maybe a tight end we can have in there that actually blocks? This has been rehashed repeatedly too on many threads.  Try reading those instead of Wolfe threads. Omelet?  Is that you?

yeah fans of Wolfe thats about it

---

We knew ... in that huddle ... there was a group ... destined ... to apply the kind of pressure ... that had not been seen before." ...

The only reason Wolfe is in the NFL is because of his play on special teams.  Due to injuries he is getting to play as the number two running back.  He is doing well and deserves our congrats.  His work ethic has kept him in the league longer than most of us ever suspected.  Again congrats.  He is not a number one running back and never will be.  However, we don't always game plan to his strength and that is a fault of coaching.

Timothy 2:4:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Savior? Who said savior? I said more carries. You are arguing against a point that no one has made.

this is like the 9000th thread someone has made about Wolfe should be our starter, Wolfe needs more carries, Wolfe averages so many yrds a carry... yada yada yada,WHO CARES! we need to concentrate on the things that matter like our disgraceful OL, and protecting our QB. not about some half pint who can barely get out of his own way

Our offense would benefit greatly from Wolfe getting more carries.  Just get over it.  Wolfe is a good back; now suck it up, be a man, and admit it!  My goodness you act like you personally dislike the guy; he has done nothing wrong and has been a great asset to the team. 

 

it's a little early to be that intoxicated isn't it?

---

We knew ... in that huddle ... there was a group ... destined ... to apply the kind of pressure ... that had not been seen before." ...

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

So what you're saying is that the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski is better than Forte?

Forte didn't break 100 yards against the Browns defense which you claim is so poor, that a dead player could break 100 yards against. In-fact Forte couldn't break 4 YPC against such a poor defense.

Both Wolfe and Forte were running behind the same disgraceful OL, so that's not the reason. They also both ran against defenses that knew runs were coming (since Turner's play-calling is so predictable), that can't be the reason either. The Browns might have been demoralized late in the game, but they're 1-7, moral can't be that high at any time during the game.

Wolfe has played well and deserves more touches. Wolfe is a good player who gets stereo-typed due to his size, he has made a couple of mistakes (trying to cut block the GB LB and the illegal man down field penalty), but no one is perfect.

---

"Nothing that anyone else says or does to you has anything whatsoever to do with you - it has only to do with who they are - their perceptions, their conditioning, their experiences - the way they are accustomed to reacting to the world around them"