Timothy 2:4:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Savior? Who said savior? I said more carries. You are arguing against a point that no one has made.

this is like the 9000th thread someone has made about Wolfe should be our starter, Wolfe needs more carries, Wolfe averages so many yrds a carry... yada yada yada,WHO CARES! we need to concentrate on the things that matter like our disgraceful OL, and protecting our QB. not about some half pint who can barely get out of his own way

Our offense would benefit greatly from Wolfe getting more carries.  Just get over it.  Wolfe is a good back; now suck it up, be a man, and admit it!  My goodness you act like you personally dislike the guy; he has done nothing wrong and has been a great asset to the team. 

 

Y cause you say so. You people keep throwing out his ypc, but when i posted AP stats showing his ypc at 5,5 5.1 and then when he upped his carries by more then double it went to 3.4.  Everybody always loves the backup till he becomes the starter.

Warlock:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

So what you're saying is that the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski is better than Forte?

Forte didn't break 100 yards against the Browns defense which you claim is so poor, that a dead player could break 100 yards against. In-fact Forte couldn't break 4 YPC against such a poor defense.

Both Wolfe and Forte were running behind the same disgraceful OL, so that's not the reason. They also both ran against defenses that knew runs were coming (since Turner's play-calling is so predictable), that can't be the reason either. The Browns might have been demoralized late in the game, but they're 1-7, moral can't be that high at any time during the game.

Wolfe has played well and deserves more touches. Wolfe is a good player who gets stereo-typed due to his size, he has made a couple of mistakes (trying to cut block the GB LB and the illegal man down field penalty), but no one is perfect.

it's not a CLAIM it's a fact do your homework

---

We knew ... in that huddle ... there was a group ... destined ... to apply the kind of pressure ... that had not been seen before." ...

beav720:

Timothy 2:4:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Savior? Who said savior? I said more carries. You are arguing against a point that no one has made.

this is like the 9000th thread someone has made about Wolfe should be our starter, Wolfe needs more carries, Wolfe averages so many yrds a carry... yada yada yada,WHO CARES! we need to concentrate on the things that matter like our disgraceful OL, and protecting our QB. not about some half pint who can barely get out of his own way

Our offense would benefit greatly from Wolfe getting more carries.  Just get over it.  Wolfe is a good back; now suck it up, be a man, and admit it!  My goodness you act like you personally dislike the guy; he has done nothing wrong and has been a great asset to the team. 

 

Y cause you say so. You people keep throwing out his ypc, but when i posted AP stats showing his ypc at 5,5 5.1 and then when he upped his carries by more then double it went to 3.4.  Everybody always loves the backup till he becomes the starter.

When they were putting AP in on 3rd downs, he had fewer carries and more yards not surprisingly.  They did that since Benson couldn't catch (or block).  So when he started carrying the ball every down, his average dropped.  They aren't using Wolfe that way, they're putting him in for a whole series - running downs as well as passing downs.  Granted, with more carries Wolfe (or anybody else) wouldn't average that many ypc behind this O-line.

Not only does everybody like the backup, they like even better guys that aren't on the team yet - we don't have them, so they have to be better than what we have.

I'll let the coaching staff determine whether it's worth giving Wolfe more carries - though I don't have any confidence they'll utilize his skills very well or call sensible plays when he is in there.

SAYERS5140:

Warlock:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

So what you're saying is that the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski is better than Forte?

Forte didn't break 100 yards against the Browns defense which you claim is so poor, that a dead player could break 100 yards against. In-fact Forte couldn't break 4 YPC against such a poor defense.

Both Wolfe and Forte were running behind the same disgraceful OL, so that's not the reason. They also both ran against defenses that knew runs were coming (since Turner's play-calling is so predictable), that can't be the reason either. The Browns might have been demoralized late in the game, but they're 1-7, moral can't be that high at any time during the game.

Wolfe has played well and deserves more touches. Wolfe is a good player who gets stereo-typed due to his size, he has made a couple of mistakes (trying to cut block the GB LB and the illegal man down field penalty), but no one is perfect.

it's not a CLAIM it's a fact do your homework

Um, Forte had 26 carries for 90 yards.  Are you including receiving yards?

SAYERS5140:

who me?

Garrett, your new glasses are YOU!

---

Godfather, Left Tackle Mafia

niu007:

SAYERS5140:

Warlock:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

So what you're saying is that the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski is better than Forte?

Forte didn't break 100 yards against the Browns defense which you claim is so poor, that a dead player could break 100 yards against. In-fact Forte couldn't break 4 YPC against such a poor defense.

Both Wolfe and Forte were running behind the same disgraceful OL, so that's not the reason. They also both ran against defenses that knew runs were coming (since Turner's play-calling is so predictable), that can't be the reason either. The Browns might have been demoralized late in the game, but they're 1-7, moral can't be that high at any time during the game.

Wolfe has played well and deserves more touches. Wolfe is a good player who gets stereo-typed due to his size, he has made a couple of mistakes (trying to cut block the GB LB and the illegal man down field penalty), but no one is perfect.

it's not a CLAIM it's a fact do your homework

Um, Forte had 26 carries for 90 yards.  Are you including receiving yards?

---

"Nothing that anyone else says or does to you has anything whatsoever to do with you - it has only to do with who they are - their perceptions, their conditioning, their experiences - the way they are accustomed to reacting to the world around them"

niu007:

SAYERS5140:

Warlock:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

So what you're saying is that the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski is better than Forte?

Forte didn't break 100 yards against the Browns defense which you claim is so poor, that a dead player could break 100 yards against. In-fact Forte couldn't break 4 YPC against such a poor defense.

Both Wolfe and Forte were running behind the same disgraceful OL, so that's not the reason. They also both ran against defenses that knew runs were coming (since Turner's play-calling is so predictable), that can't be the reason either. The Browns might have been demoralized late in the game, but they're 1-7, moral can't be that high at any time during the game.

Wolfe has played well and deserves more touches. Wolfe is a good player who gets stereo-typed due to his size, he has made a couple of mistakes (trying to cut block the GB LB and the illegal man down field penalty), but no one is perfect.

it's not a CLAIM it's a fact do your homework

Um, Forte had 26 carries for 90 yards.  Are you including receiving yards?

he's talkin about my so called claim that the Browns are a poor D ranked 31st against the run yeah thats poor no matter how ya slice it

---

We knew ... in that huddle ... there was a group ... destined ... to apply the kind of pressure ... that had not been seen before." ...

niu007:

SAYERS5140:

Warlock:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

So what you're saying is that the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski is better than Forte?

Forte didn't break 100 yards against the Browns defense which you claim is so poor, that a dead player could break 100 yards against. In-fact Forte couldn't break 4 YPC against such a poor defense.

Both Wolfe and Forte were running behind the same disgraceful OL, so that's not the reason. They also both ran against defenses that knew runs were coming (since Turner's play-calling is so predictable), that can't be the reason either. The Browns might have been demoralized late in the game, but they're 1-7, moral can't be that high at any time during the game.

Wolfe has played well and deserves more touches. Wolfe is a good player who gets stereo-typed due to his size, he has made a couple of mistakes (trying to cut block the GB LB and the illegal man down field penalty), but no one is perfect.

it's not a CLAIM it's a fact do your homework

Um, Forte had 26 carries for 90 yards.  Are you including receiving yards?

Forte had 121 total yrds yesterday

---

We knew ... in that huddle ... there was a group ... destined ... to apply the kind of pressure ... that had not been seen before." ...

Warlock:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

So what you're saying is that the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski is better than Forte?

Forte didn't break 100 yards against the Browns defense which you claim is so poor, that a dead player could break 100 yards against. In-fact Forte couldn't break 4 YPC against such a poor defense.

Both Wolfe and Forte were running behind the same disgraceful OL, so that's not the reason. They also both ran against defenses that knew runs were coming (since Turner's play-calling is so predictable), that can't be the reason either. The Browns might have been demoralized late in the game, but they're 1-7, moral can't be that high at any time during the game.

Wolfe has played well and deserves more touches. Wolfe is a good player who gets stereo-typed due to his size, he has made a couple of mistakes (trying to cut block the GB LB and the illegal man down field penalty), but no one is perfect.

Agreed.  Forte has let so many guys get by him when he blocks.  It was his guy who got past him to force that fumble on Cutler.  Also I am happy you brought up the GB LB because a defender ran over Forte when he went low to block and fell yesterday.

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Who said he is a savior?  Some people just think he should get some more playing time.  Why is it a misconception for him to carry the load?  Is his size seriously the only reason why you make that statement?  Can you ever use anything else besides being stereotypical towards his size?  And I guess you think the skeletal reamains of Bronko Nagurski could run better than Matt Forte.  Wolfe had more than half as many yards as Forte and Forte had 5 times as many carries as he did.

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Who said he is a savior?  Some people just think he should get some more playing time.  Why is it a misconception for him to carry the load?  Is his size seriously the only reason why you make that statement?  Can you ever use anything else besides being stereotypical towards his size?  And I guess you think the skeletal reamains of Bronko Nagurski could run better than Matt Forte.  Wolfe had more than half as many yards as Forte and Forte had 5 times as many carries as he did.

good elect em to the Pro Bowl, give em 30 carries a game and see where his average goes. please!

---

We knew ... in that huddle ... there was a group ... destined ... to apply the kind of pressure ... that had not been seen before." ...

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Who said he is a savior?  Some people just think he should get some more playing time.  Why is it a misconception for him to carry the load?  Is his size seriously the only reason why you make that statement?  Can you ever use anything else besides being stereotypical towards his size?  And I guess you think the skeletal reamains of Bronko Nagurski could run better than Matt Forte.  Wolfe had more than half as many yards as Forte and Forte had 5 times as many carries as he did.

good elect em to the Pro Bowl

I don't even think he should be going to the pro bowl right now, you are probably the only one to state that.  You obviously know that Wolfe played good but you do not want to admit it.  And once again, you have nothing but a smart a** comment.  When will you back yourself up man?

niu007:

beav720:

Timothy 2:4:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Savior? Who said savior? I said more carries. You are arguing against a point that no one has made.

this is like the 9000th thread someone has made about Wolfe should be our starter, Wolfe needs more carries, Wolfe averages so many yrds a carry... yada yada yada,WHO CARES! we need to concentrate on the things that matter like our disgraceful OL, and protecting our QB. not about some half pint who can barely get out of his own way

Our offense would benefit greatly from Wolfe getting more carries.  Just get over it.  Wolfe is a good back; now suck it up, be a man, and admit it!  My goodness you act like you personally dislike the guy; he has done nothing wrong and has been a great asset to the team. 

 

Y cause you say so. You people keep throwing out his ypc, but when i posted AP stats showing his ypc at 5,5 5.1 and then when he upped his carries by more then double it went to 3.4.  Everybody always loves the backup till he becomes the starter.

When they were putting AP in on 3rd downs, he had fewer carries and more yards not surprisingly.  They did that since Benson couldn't catch (or block).  So when he started carrying the ball every down, his average dropped.  They aren't using Wolfe that way, they're putting him in for a whole series - running downs as well as passing downs.  Granted, with more carries Wolfe (or anybody else) wouldn't average that many ypc behind this O-line.

Not only does everybody like the backup, they like even better guys that aren't on the team yet - we don't have them, so they have to be better than what we have.

I'll let the coaching staff determine whether it's worth giving Wolfe more carries - though I don't have any confidence they'll utilize his skills very well or call sensible plays when he is in there.

you really can't rely on our coaching staff to determine who should play or not. We have all seen that lovie plays how he likes even if hes not the better player. He didnt change LT tell the media and gm called him out. Im not knoking Wolfe, I think all 3 of are back should play. They all have dif strenghs

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Who said he is a savior?  Some people just think he should get some more playing time.  Why is it a misconception for him to carry the load?  Is his size seriously the only reason why you make that statement?  Can you ever use anything else besides being stereotypical towards his size?  And I guess you think the skeletal reamains of Bronko Nagurski could run better than Matt Forte.  Wolfe had more than half as many yards as Forte and Forte had 5 times as many carries as he did.

good elect em to the Pro Bowl

I don't even think he should be going to the pro bowl right now, you are probably the only one to state that.  You obviously know that Wolfe played good but you do not want to admit it.  And once again, you have nothing but a smart a** comment.  When will you back yourself up man?

the guy went in when we were up by 24, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run, and you guys all wanna crown em LOL, LIKE HE REALLY ACCOMPLISHED SOMETHING like i said before give em 30 touches a game and i'll guarantee ya he won't be averaging anywhere close to even 5 yrds a carry. but you can continue to ride his bandwagon, whatever floats your boat i guess

---

We knew ... in that huddle ... there was a group ... destined ... to apply the kind of pressure ... that had not been seen before." ...

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Who said he is a savior?  Some people just think he should get some more playing time.  Why is it a misconception for him to carry the load?  Is his size seriously the only reason why you make that statement?  Can you ever use anything else besides being stereotypical towards his size?  And I guess you think the skeletal reamains of Bronko Nagurski could run better than Matt Forte.  Wolfe had more than half as many yards as Forte and Forte had 5 times as many carries as he did.

good elect em to the Pro Bowl

I don't even think he should be going to the pro bowl right now, you are probably the only one to state that.  You obviously know that Wolfe played good but you do not want to admit it.  And once again, you have nothing but a smart a** comment.  When will you back yourself up man?

the guy went in when we were up by 24, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run like i said before give em 30 touches a game and i'll guarantee ya he won't be averaging anywhere close to even 5 yrds a carry. but you can continue to ride his bandwagon, whatever floats your boat i guess

Ride the ban wagon because I have been a fan of him since he was drafted and when he played at NIU!?  That shows right there that I am not a ban wagon jumper, the guy doesn't start and I am still a fan of him.  A ban wagon jumper would be someone who liked Forte last year and doesn't like him this year.  Since we traded him away, I have been saying that I would still have Thomas Jones over Matt Forte.  I have never been a fan of Forte but I do not feel hatred towards the guy like some of you feel towards Wolfe.  I have admitted that Forte is a good running back and I give him his credit too.  I think it's crazy how so many people jumped on the Forte ban wagon last year and now they do not like him.  That is a ban wagon fan.  And you want to take away Wolfe stats because it was against the 31st ranked defense?  Forte had 26 carries and didn't even top 100 yards!  His ypc was only 3.5 and Wolfe averaged 10.6 and his longest run was a lot longer than Forte's and Forte had so many more oppurtunites.  Wolfe's ypc average could very well drop if he carried the load but I still think he could do it.  Why don't you think he can do it?  Is it still because you say he is to small?

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Who said he is a savior?  Some people just think he should get some more playing time.  Why is it a misconception for him to carry the load?  Is his size seriously the only reason why you make that statement?  Can you ever use anything else besides being stereotypical towards his size?  And I guess you think the skeletal reamains of Bronko Nagurski could run better than Matt Forte.  Wolfe had more than half as many yards as Forte and Forte had 5 times as many carries as he did.

good elect em to the Pro Bowl

I don't even think he should be going to the pro bowl right now, you are probably the only one to state that.  You obviously know that Wolfe played good but you do not want to admit it.  And once again, you have nothing but a smart a** comment.  When will you back yourself up man?

the guy went in when we were up by 24, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run like i said before give em 30 touches a game and i'll guarantee ya he won't be averaging anywhere close to even 5 yrds a carry. but you can continue to ride his bandwagon, whatever floats your boat i guess

Ride the ban wagon because I have been a fan of him since he was drafted and when he played at NIU!?  That shows right there that I am not a ban wagon jumper, the guy doesn't start and I am still a fan of him.  A ban wagon jumper would be someone who liked Forte last year and doesn't like him this year.  Since we traded him away, I have been saying that I would still have Thomas Jones over Matt Forte.  I have never been a fan of Forte but I do not feel hatred towards the guy like some of you feel towards Wolfe.  I have admitted that Forte is a good running back and I give him his credit too.  I think it's crazy how so many people jumped on the Forte ban wagon last year and now they do not like him.  That is a ban wagon fan.  And you want to take away Wolfe stats because it was against the 31st ranked defense?  Forte had 26 carries and didn't even top 100 yards!  His ypc was only 3.5 and Wolfe averaged 10.6 and his longest run was a lot longer than Forte's and Forte had so many more oppurtunites.  Wolfe's ypc average could very well drop if he carried the load but I still think he could do it.  Why don't you think he can do it?  Is it still because you say he is to small?

hey i thought Forte was gonna be the next Neal Anderson, now that seems to be a pipe dream, and it's not that i dis-like him but i do have some reservations about his abilities to be the guy carring the load now. 

---

We knew ... in that huddle ... there was a group ... destined ... to apply the kind of pressure ... that had not been seen before." ...

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Who said he is a savior?  Some people just think he should get some more playing time.  Why is it a misconception for him to carry the load?  Is his size seriously the only reason why you make that statement?  Can you ever use anything else besides being stereotypical towards his size?  And I guess you think the skeletal reamains of Bronko Nagurski could run better than Matt Forte.  Wolfe had more than half as many yards as Forte and Forte had 5 times as many carries as he did.

good elect em to the Pro Bowl

I don't even think he should be going to the pro bowl right now, you are probably the only one to state that.  You obviously know that Wolfe played good but you do not want to admit it.  And once again, you have nothing but a smart a** comment.  When will you back yourself up man?

the guy went in when we were up by 24, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run like i said before give em 30 touches a game and i'll guarantee ya he won't be averaging anywhere close to even 5 yrds a carry. but you can continue to ride his bandwagon, whatever floats your boat i guess

Ride the ban wagon because I have been a fan of him since he was drafted and when he played at NIU!?  That shows right there that I am not a ban wagon jumper, the guy doesn't start and I am still a fan of him.  A ban wagon jumper would be someone who liked Forte last year and doesn't like him this year.  Since we traded him away, I have been saying that I would still have Thomas Jones over Matt Forte.  I have never been a fan of Forte but I do not feel hatred towards the guy like some of you feel towards Wolfe.  I have admitted that Forte is a good running back and I give him his credit too.  I think it's crazy how so many people jumped on the Forte ban wagon last year and now they do not like him.  That is a ban wagon fan.  And you want to take away Wolfe stats because it was against the 31st ranked defense?  Forte had 26 carries and didn't even top 100 yards!  His ypc was only 3.5 and Wolfe averaged 10.6 and his longest run was a lot longer than Forte's and Forte had so many more oppurtunites.  Wolfe's ypc average could very well drop if he carried the load but I still think he could do it.  Why don't you think he can do it?  Is it still because you say he is to small?

hey i thought Forte was gonna be the next Neal Anderson, now that seems to be a pipe dream, and it's not that i dis-like him but i do have some reservations about his abilities to be the guy carring the load now. 

Okay and that's fine.  It's just that some people have different opinions than you.  You shouldn't bash them for it.  Some people think he could carry the load, some people don't think he can carry the load and that's fine, it's just the way how you were posting stuff it kind of made it look like you hate the guy.

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Who said he is a savior?  Some people just think he should get some more playing time.  Why is it a misconception for him to carry the load?  Is his size seriously the only reason why you make that statement?  Can you ever use anything else besides being stereotypical towards his size?  And I guess you think the skeletal reamains of Bronko Nagurski could run better than Matt Forte.  Wolfe had more than half as many yards as Forte and Forte had 5 times as many carries as he did.

good elect em to the Pro Bowl

I don't even think he should be going to the pro bowl right now, you are probably the only one to state that.  You obviously know that Wolfe played good but you do not want to admit it.  And once again, you have nothing but a smart a** comment.  When will you back yourself up man?

the guy went in when we were up by 24, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run like i said before give em 30 touches a game and i'll guarantee ya he won't be averaging anywhere close to even 5 yrds a carry. but you can continue to ride his bandwagon, whatever floats your boat i guess

Ride the ban wagon because I have been a fan of him since he was drafted and when he played at NIU!?  That shows right there that I am not a ban wagon jumper, the guy doesn't start and I am still a fan of him.  A ban wagon jumper would be someone who liked Forte last year and doesn't like him this year.  Since we traded him away, I have been saying that I would still have Thomas Jones over Matt Forte.  I have never been a fan of Forte but I do not feel hatred towards the guy like some of you feel towards Wolfe.  I have admitted that Forte is a good running back and I give him his credit too.  I think it's crazy how so many people jumped on the Forte ban wagon last year and now they do not like him.  That is a ban wagon fan.  And you want to take away Wolfe stats because it was against the 31st ranked defense?  Forte had 26 carries and didn't even top 100 yards!  His ypc was only 3.5 and Wolfe averaged 10.6 and his longest run was a lot longer than Forte's and Forte had so many more oppurtunites.  Wolfe's ypc average could very well drop if he carried the load but I still think he could do it.  Why don't you think he can do it?  Is it still because you say he is to small?

hey i thought Forte was gonna be the next Neal Anderson, now that seems to be a pipe dream, and it's not that i dis-like him but i do have some reservations about his abilities to be the guy carring the load now. 

Okay and that's fine.  It's just that some people have different opinions than you.  You shouldn't bash them for it.  Some people think he could carry the load, some people don't think he can carry the load and that's fine, it's just the way how you were posting stuff it kind of made it look like you hate the guy.

i don't hate the guy thats a strong word, but i know he's not the answer to our running game, bashing?? trust me that wasn't bashing, i just find these Wolfe threads  all quite comical

---

We knew ... in that huddle ... there was a group ... destined ... to apply the kind of pressure ... that had not been seen before." ...

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Who said he is a savior?  Some people just think he should get some more playing time.  Why is it a misconception for him to carry the load?  Is his size seriously the only reason why you make that statement?  Can you ever use anything else besides being stereotypical towards his size?  And I guess you think the skeletal reamains of Bronko Nagurski could run better than Matt Forte.  Wolfe had more than half as many yards as Forte and Forte had 5 times as many carries as he did.

good elect em to the Pro Bowl

I don't even think he should be going to the pro bowl right now, you are probably the only one to state that.  You obviously know that Wolfe played good but you do not want to admit it.  And once again, you have nothing but a smart a** comment.  When will you back yourself up man?

Whenever you don't like someone's answer you say they can't back up their opinions. It's getting very old. Then you whine that people should allow you to have your opinions and not challenge them.

You have Wolfe Man-Love and we get that. But know that no head coach or GM in the league would allow Wolfe to be their #1 or #2 RB

---

Godfather, Left Tackle Mafia

Omeletpants:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Who said he is a savior?  Some people just think he should get some more playing time.  Why is it a misconception for him to carry the load?  Is his size seriously the only reason why you make that statement?  Can you ever use anything else besides being stereotypical towards his size?  And I guess you think the skeletal reamains of Bronko Nagurski could run better than Matt Forte.  Wolfe had more than half as many yards as Forte and Forte had 5 times as many carries as he did.

good elect em to the Pro Bowl

I don't even think he should be going to the pro bowl right now, you are probably the only one to state that.  You obviously know that Wolfe played good but you do not want to admit it.  And once again, you have nothing but a smart a** comment.  When will you back yourself up man?

Whenever you don't like someone's answer you say they can't back up their opinions. It's getting very old. Then you whine that people should allow you to have your opinions and not challenge them.

You have Wolfe Man-Love and we get that. But know that no head coach or GM in the league would allow Wolfe to be their #1 or #2 RB

There's at least one that would. After KJ went down, they didn't bring in another back. Instead, they named Wolfe the #2 back over AP and stuck with the RBs they had. Not that Wolfe would have carried the load if AP went down, but he wouldn't need to since he could split carries with AP. And even after AP went down for a couple of games they didn't bring anybody else in - they obviously felt they were okay with Wolfe as the #2 for a couple games even with no other back able to play.

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Who said he is a savior?  Some people just think he should get some more playing time.  Why is it a misconception for him to carry the load?  Is his size seriously the only reason why you make that statement?  Can you ever use anything else besides being stereotypical towards his size?  And I guess you think the skeletal reamains of Bronko Nagurski could run better than Matt Forte.  Wolfe had more than half as many yards as Forte and Forte had 5 times as many carries as he did.

good elect em to the Pro Bowl, give em 30 carries a game and see where his average goes. please!

You're crazy man.  NO ONE wants Wolfe to start, or get 30 carries a game.  Again, NO ONE WANTS WOLFE TO START. 

What people are advocating is a higher percentage of carries.  More than 4 carries a game. 

Do you really disagree with that?  Have you watched any of the games this year?

---

coachjsun:

After todays game I'm putting more blame on Turner, he's not too tricky or creative.  Usually he'll bring in Wolfe or Peterson for a series.  I like the idea of bringing in Wolfe at various times and formations, you know random.  Our line is bad but Ron only seems to make things worse.  Still no matter what, I'm sure Wolfe can't be your ever down back, I'd have to agree with the earlier post "he'd get broke"

I think that while Wolfe is nothing more than a gimmick type of back, the way Turner uses the guy hinders any real potential to be a kind of weapon we could count on a bit each game. He has a set time to come in in the first and second half, teams know when he's coming onto the field, he'll be in there for the duration of that drive. They know that Turner has no idea how to use the kid, so he's not much of a threat to them.

If we would be more randem, giving him a play or two each drive or so would make him less predictable. I don't think he'll ever be a big time weapon, but if used in limited times effectively, we could get the absolute most out of him.

niu007:

Omeletpants:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Who said he is a savior?  Some people just think he should get some more playing time.  Why is it a misconception for him to carry the load?  Is his size seriously the only reason why you make that statement?  Can you ever use anything else besides being stereotypical towards his size?  And I guess you think the skeletal reamains of Bronko Nagurski could run better than Matt Forte.  Wolfe had more than half as many yards as Forte and Forte had 5 times as many carries as he did.

good elect em to the Pro Bowl

I don't even think he should be going to the pro bowl right now, you are probably the only one to state that.  You obviously know that Wolfe played good but you do not want to admit it.  And once again, you have nothing but a smart a** comment.  When will you back yourself up man?

Whenever you don't like someone's answer you say they can't back up their opinions. It's getting very old. Then you whine that people should allow you to have your opinions and not challenge them.

You have Wolfe Man-Love and we get that. But know that no head coach or GM in the league would allow Wolfe to be their #1 or #2 RB

There's at least one that would. After KJ went down, they didn't bring in another back. Instead, they named Wolfe the #2 back over AP and stuck with the RBs they had. Not that Wolfe would have carried the load if AP went down, but he wouldn't need to since he could split carries with AP. And even after AP went down for a couple of games they didn't bring anybody else in - they obviously felt they were okay with Wolfe as the #2 for a couple games even with no other back able to play.

Maybe you have forgotten that Lovie is a nitwit?

---

Godfather, Left Tackle Mafia

Omeletpants:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Who said he is a savior?  Some people just think he should get some more playing time.  Why is it a misconception for him to carry the load?  Is his size seriously the only reason why you make that statement?  Can you ever use anything else besides being stereotypical towards his size?  And I guess you think the skeletal reamains of Bronko Nagurski could run better than Matt Forte.  Wolfe had more than half as many yards as Forte and Forte had 5 times as many carries as he did.

good elect em to the Pro Bowl

I don't even think he should be going to the pro bowl right now, you are probably the only one to state that.  You obviously know that Wolfe played good but you do not want to admit it.  And once again, you have nothing but a smart a** comment.  When will you back yourself up man?

Whenever you don't like someone's answer you say they can't back up their opinions. It's getting very old. Then you whine that people should allow you to have your opinions and not challenge them. You have Wolfe Man-Love and we get that. But know that no head coach or GM in the league would allow Wolfe to be their #1 or #2 RB

No you never post opinions you always post statements and then you tell me that my opinions are wrong.  When ever you post a statement and it is proven wrong you start to take it out on that person who calls you out on it.  I bring up stats and facts to prove your statements wrong.  I have posted on this message board plenty of times that I don't care what peoples opinions are because every one is entitled to their own opinion.  It is you who gets upset when people disagree with you that and you know that.  When someone says their opinion is that they think Wolfe should get more carries you always say something against it that their opinion is wrong.  If you disagree that is your opinion, don't go and say oh you are wrong because I don't think he deserves more carries.

Can we please stop saying that he played good? It's terribly annoying.

---