Omeletpants:

niu007:

Omeletpants:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Who said he is a savior?  Some people just think he should get some more playing time.  Why is it a misconception for him to carry the load?  Is his size seriously the only reason why you make that statement?  Can you ever use anything else besides being stereotypical towards his size?  And I guess you think the skeletal reamains of Bronko Nagurski could run better than Matt Forte.  Wolfe had more than half as many yards as Forte and Forte had 5 times as many carries as he did.

good elect em to the Pro Bowl

I don't even think he should be going to the pro bowl right now, you are probably the only one to state that.  You obviously know that Wolfe played good but you do not want to admit it.  And once again, you have nothing but a smart a** comment.  When will you back yourself up man?

Whenever you don't like someone's answer you say they can't back up their opinions. It's getting very old. Then you whine that people should allow you to have your opinions and not challenge them. You have Wolfe Man-Love and we get that. But know that no head coach or GM in the league would allow Wolfe to be their #1 or #2 RB

There's at least one that would. After KJ went down, they didn't bring in another back. Instead, they named Wolfe the #2 back over AP and stuck with the RBs they had. Not that Wolfe would have carried the load if AP went down, but he wouldn't need to since he could split carries with AP. And even after AP went down for a couple of games they didn't bring anybody else in - they obviously felt they were okay with Wolfe as the #2 for a couple games even with no other back able to play.

Maybe you have forgotten that Lovie is a nitwit?

Omelet that may have been the most truthful and best post I have seen in a long time.

Windy City Liar:

Can we please stop saying that he played good? It's terribly annoying.

Why is it annoying?

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

Can we please stop saying that he played good? It's terribly annoying.

Why is it annoying?

Windy City Liar:

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

Can we please stop saying that he played good? It's terribly annoying.

Why is it annoying?

"Good" is not an adverb.

Windy City Liar:

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

Can we please stop saying that he played good? It's terribly annoying.

Why is it annoying?

"Good" is not an adverb.

I asked why is it annoying not if good was an adverb.

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

Can we please stop saying that he played good? It's terribly annoying.

Why is it annoying?

"Good" is not an adverb.

I asked why is it annoying not if good was an adverb.

it doesn't matter your getting a lesson in proper english anyway

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

Can we please stop saying that he played good? It's terribly annoying.

Why is it annoying?

"Good" is not an adverb.

I asked why is it annoying not if good was an adverb.

it doesn't matter your getting a lesson in proper english anyway

Yeah but it was a lesson to something that I already knew.

ThadtheBear:

Windy City Liar:

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

Can we please stop saying that he played good? It's terribly annoying.

Why is it annoying?

"Good" is not an adverb.

Yeah, and the sentence in your sig has no referent.. :)

Windy City Liar:

ThadtheBear:

Windy City Liar:

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

Can we please stop saying that he played good? It's terribly annoying.

Why is it annoying?

"Good" is not an adverb.

Yeah, and the sentence in your sig has no referent.. :)

I'm using an absent referent which is acceptable. "Played good" is never acceptable.

realred2:

I'm rewatching the game, since I missed the 1st quarter, and watched the series Wolfe was in, and think If Cutler could have gotten that screen pass up higher to Wolfe in stride, that was a TD, there was plenty of blocking in front of him. I watched it 4 times just to make sure. I would like to see some more playing time for Wolfe.

I agree.  I hope he plays more, he has played well when given the chance and he continues to prove people wrong.  All I ask is to give him a chance, people need to quit using his size against him, he has done nothing but perform.

Omeletpants:

niu007:

Omeletpants:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Who said he is a savior?  Some people just think he should get some more playing time.  Why is it a misconception for him to carry the load?  Is his size seriously the only reason why you make that statement?  Can you ever use anything else besides being stereotypical towards his size?  And I guess you think the skeletal reamains of Bronko Nagurski could run better than Matt Forte.  Wolfe had more than half as many yards as Forte and Forte had 5 times as many carries as he did.

good elect em to the Pro Bowl

I don't even think he should be going to the pro bowl right now, you are probably the only one to state that.  You obviously know that Wolfe played good but you do not want to admit it.  And once again, you have nothing but a smart a** comment.  When will you back yourself up man?

Whenever you don't like someone's answer you say they can't back up their opinions. It's getting very old. Then you whine that people should allow you to have your opinions and not challenge them.

You have Wolfe Man-Love and we get that. But know that no head coach or GM in the league would allow Wolfe to be their #1 or #2 RB

There's at least one that would. After KJ went down, they didn't bring in another back. Instead, they named Wolfe the #2 back over AP and stuck with the RBs they had. Not that Wolfe would have carried the load if AP went down, but he wouldn't need to since he could split carries with AP. And even after AP went down for a couple of games they didn't bring anybody else in - they obviously felt they were okay with Wolfe as the #2 for a couple games even with no other back able to play.

Maybe you have forgotten that Lovie is a nitwit?

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

Can we please stop saying that he played good? It's terribly annoying.

Why is it annoying?

"Good" is not an adverb.

I asked why is it annoying not if good was an adverb.

it doesn't matter your getting a lesson in proper english anyway

niu007:

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

Can we please stop saying that he played good? It's terribly annoying.

Why is it annoying?

"Good" is not an adverb.

I asked why is it annoying not if good was an adverb.

it doesn't matter your getting a lesson in proper english anyway

You mean "You're getting a lesson in proper English".

JStuckel21:

niu007:

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

Can we please stop saying that he played good? It's terribly annoying.

Why is it annoying?

"Good" is not an adverb.

I asked why is it annoying not if good was an adverb.

it doesn't matter your getting a lesson in proper english anyway

You mean "You're getting a lesson in proper English".

Owned.

niu007:

Omeletpants:

niu007:

Omeletpants:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

number51:

SAYERS5140:

Yeah... Cutler averaged 6.2 yrds a carry so whats your point?

Really, you don't get the point of this thread?

1. Some people think Garret Wolfe should get more carries.
2. Some people think that when the offense is running out the clock the defense plays prevent.

I Agree with point one, and strongly disagree with point two. Cutlers ypc are irrelevant to either discussion.

yeah so are Wolfes when were ahead by 24 pts, against a team that ranks 31st in the league against the run. WOW!!!

So GW should not get more carries in the future, because he was put into the game late?  WOW!!!

Not that is some fancy logic right there.

no it's just that everyone thinks he's some kind of savior for us, and that he could carry the load for us which is a complete misconception, i mean c'mon the skeletal remains of Bronko Nagurski could run for over 100 yrds against the Browns

 

Who said he is a savior?  Some people just think he should get some more playing time.  Why is it a misconception for him to carry the load?  Is his size seriously the only reason why you make that statement?  Can you ever use anything else besides being stereotypical towards his size?  And I guess you think the skeletal reamains of Bronko Nagurski could run better than Matt Forte.  Wolfe had more than half as many yards as Forte and Forte had 5 times as many carries as he did.

good elect em to the Pro Bowl

I don't even think he should be going to the pro bowl right now, you are probably the only one to state that.  You obviously know that Wolfe played good but you do not want to admit it.  And once again, you have nothing but a smart a** comment.  When will you back yourself up man?

Whenever you don't like someone's answer you say they can't back up their opinions. It's getting very old. Then you whine that people should allow you to have your opinions and not challenge them. You have Wolfe Man-Love and we get that. But know that no head coach or GM in the league would allow Wolfe to be their #1 or #2 RB

There's at least one that would. After KJ went down, they didn't bring in another back. Instead, they named Wolfe the #2 back over AP and stuck with the RBs they had. Not that Wolfe would have carried the load if AP went down, but he wouldn't need to since he could split carries with AP. And even after AP went down for a couple of games they didn't bring anybody else in - they obviously felt they were okay with Wolfe as the #2 for a couple games even with no other back able to play.

Maybe you have forgotten that Lovie is a nitwit?

You said that no head coach would have Wolfe as a #2 back. Lovie is a head coach and Wolfe is the #2 back. Therefore, you're wrong. Lovie may be a nitwit, but he's a head coach.

Exactly.

niu007:

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

Can we please stop saying that he played good? It's terribly annoying.

Why is it annoying?

"Good" is not an adverb.

I asked why is it annoying not if good was an adverb.

it doesn't matter your getting a lesson in proper english anyway

You mean "You're getting a lesson in proper English".

Ha ha nice!

number51:

JStuckel21:

niu007:

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

Can we please stop saying that he played good? It's terribly annoying.

Why is it annoying?

"Good" is not an adverb.

I asked why is it annoying not if good was an adverb.

it doesn't matter your getting a lesson in proper english anyway

You mean "You're getting a lesson in proper English".

Owned.

Those larger fonts really pay off when you're sticking your foot in your mouth.

Ha ha nice!

number51:

JStuckel21:

niu007:

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

Can we please stop saying that he played good? It's terribly annoying.

Why is it annoying?

"Good" is not an adverb.

I asked why is it annoying not if good was an adverb.

it doesn't matter your getting a lesson in proper english anyway

You mean "You're getting a lesson in proper English".

Owned.

Those larger fonts really pay off when you're sticking your foot in your mouth.

hey Einstein when you go to the mind-reader, do you get half price

JStuckel21:

niu007:

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

Can we please stop saying that he played good? It's terribly annoying.

Why is it annoying?

"Good" is not an adverb.

I asked why is it annoying not if good was an adverb.

it doesn't matter your getting a lesson in proper english anyway

You mean "You're getting a lesson in proper English".

Owned.

owned?? LOL there's a village somewhere missing an iamanidiot, but he has been found!

DaBears253313:

number51:

JStuckel21:

niu007:

SAYERS5140:

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

DaBears253313:

Windy City Liar:

Can we please stop saying that he played good? It's terribly annoying.

Why is it annoying?

"Good" is not an adverb.

I asked why is it annoying not if good was an adverb.

it doesn't matter your getting a lesson in proper english anyway

You mean "You're getting a lesson in proper English".

Owned.

Those larger fonts really pay off when you're sticking your foot in your mouth.

Ha ha nice!

remember a closed mouth gathers no foot, so physician heal thy self

SAYERS5140:

hey what ya say we try an elect Wolfe to the Pro Bowl! ya bunch of delirious torch carriers

You are the only one saying to elect Wolfe to the pro bowl!  Even Wolfe fans aren't electing him.