Rival Central

Re: Senseless Smac

PapaBear.OR — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:57:36 GMT

IHATETHEBEARS:
ABQbearfan:
PapaBear.OR:
Speaking of Kool-Aid, packers suck! Wait, that has nothing at all to do with Kool-Aid. Oh well, in terms of senseless smac I feel no remorse for offering up that nugget of wisdom at this juncture.
You are indeed wise.

A wise-something.

I'll take that as a compliment...... I been called worse..

Re: Senseless Smac

IHATETHEBEARS — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:01:44 GMT

ABQbearfan:
PapaBear.OR:
Speaking of Kool-Aid, packers suck! Wait, that has nothing at all to do with Kool-Aid. Oh well, in terms of senseless smac I feel no remorse for offering up that nugget of wisdom at this juncture.
You are indeed wise.

A wise-something.

Re: Senseless Smac

ABQbearfan — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 03:39:50 GMT

PapaBear.OR:
Speaking of Kool-Aid, packers suck! Wait, that has nothing at all to do with Kool-Aid. Oh well, in terms of senseless smac I feel no remorse for offering up that nugget of wisdom at this juncture.

You are indeed wise.

Re: Senseless Smac

PapaBear.OR — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:37:43 GMT

Speaking of Kool-Aid, packers suck! Wait, that has nothing at all to do with Kool-Aid. Oh well, in terms of senseless smac I feel no remorse for offering up that nugget of wisdom at this juncture.

Re: Senseless Smac

IHATETHEBEARS — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 05:09:28 GMT

PapaBear.OR:
IHATETHEBEARS:

wisco:
IHATETHEBEARS:
Well I think musical chairs was inevitable. I don't think Jackson or Rosenfels are a long term answer either.
I think the above means we somewhat agree. Better write this day down.

Yeah, what is that, three or four times today? Must be something in the air.

See!!! Wisc and IHTB agreeing!!!! ................ soft I tells ya. Ya'all is git-un soft.

Wisc doesn't drink the Kool-Aid that most everyone else around here does.

Re: Senseless Smac

PapaBear.OR — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 03:20:05 GMT

IHATETHEBEARS:
wisco:
IHATETHEBEARS:
Well I think musical chairs was inevitable. I don't think Jackson or Rosenfels are a long term answer either.
I think the above means we somewhat agree. Better write this day down.

Yeah, what is that, three or four times today? Must be something in the air.

See!!! Wisc and IHTB agreeing!!!! ................ soft I tells ya. Ya'all is git-un soft.

Re: Senseless Smac

PapaBear.OR — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 03:17:55 GMT

bearhunter:
ROFL

Um, The BMB is soft cause we got these newbs com-un in here sling-un weak as smac bout Broncos fans feelings and Santa Clause. Best pot shot they can muster is play-un the homer card. Seriously, one dude played a pair in the same post, that thar is soft.

Look Virginia, there is a Santa Clause............... just cause he leaves yer sorry buttocks a lump a coal every year don't mean he aint still make-un the rounds. Leave Santa out of this!

Re: Senseless Smac

IHATETHEBEARS — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:33:03 GMT

wisco:
IHATETHEBEARS:
Well I think musical chairs was inevitable. I don't think Jackson or Rosenfels are a long term answer either.
I think the above means we somewhat agree. Better write this day down.

Yeah, what is that, three or four times today? Must be something in the air.

Re: Senseless Smac

wisco — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:28:22 GMT

IHATETHEBEARS:
Well I think musical chairs was inevitable. I don't think Jackson or Rosenfels are a long term answer either.

I think the above means we somewhat agree.

Better write this day down.

Re: Senseless Smac

beargods3454 — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:37:18 GMT

bearhunter:
PapaBear.OR:
What happened to this MB while I was gone? A quick look around and rivals ur extending olive branches? Is that what they're call-un it now? What happened to the chicken? And this coming from a fan of the Packers who boast Aaron Rogers at QB. Aaron Rogers?
Word on the street is Aaron Rogers sits when he pees. I'm not say-un he's a momma's boy, but he never got lip service fer leaving the seat up.

And what's this "Bears suck" followed by a bunch a cheap shots at Cutler? I seen better smac from a drug induced cross dressing Tranny ride-un backwards in the bed of a turnip truck. Jay Cutler is gonna tear the NFCN a new rectum. When he gits through with this conference small children in Minnesota will weep, openly, like Favre all three times he retired, or was it four? I fergit. But weep they will, like a Lions fans on opening day every bloody season in my lifetime. Poor bassakwardturds...... I almost feel sorry fer the Lions. Not really, but I was gonna.

This MB is go-un soft, I miss the senseless smac...............

Um, the BMB is soft because your pathetic Bears have been an overall "soft" non-winning franchise the past 2 straight years (16-16, .500) while both the Vikings and Packers have both made it to the playoffs. And now you think Cutler is your new savior. Well, let me tell you something about your soft serve bears, they are chubby and out of shape. The Broncos franchise and fans all felt that Cutler was going to be their next John Elway and look where he is now. His mouth and attitude landed him in the windy city and suddenly you Bears fans feel like the sky's the limit. LMAO, your homerism is pathetic...."Jay Cutler is gonna tear the NFCN a new rectum"....ROFL. Those same words work spoken in the AFCW and clearly the world has witnessed who's rectum ended up getting torn.

Look homer, the Guy has been a loser all his adult life. Now that he's your QB what makes you think he's suddenly gonna change? Your setting yourself up for major dissapointment. Can't say I didn't warm you so don't come cryin' back to me (or anyone else on this board) who understands why nothing good has ever come out of the city of Santa Clause, Indiana. Sayin Cutler is gonna tear the NFCN a new rectum would be the same thing as you saying "I believe in Santa Clause and that reindeer fly.

Clearly we can see who's the one who's gotten soft around here....

Chargers are soft and you make imbreaded people seem smart. GOOD DAY!

Re: Senseless Smac

IHATETHEBEARS — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:44:25 GMT

Well I think musical chairs was inevitable. I don't think Jackson or Rosenfels are a long term answer either.

Re: Senseless Smac

wisco — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:28:40 GMT

IHATETHEBEARS:
wisco:
IHATETHEBEARS:

wisco:
No problemo Geno. I agree Favre makes the Vikings better.

Wow. Congrats Wisc. You are officially a minority around here. Only you and I, and another Bear fan or two actually believe this.

It is short term and will hurt them in the long run. They are a playoff team with or without the drama queen viqueen. It is a win/win... he is laying a davenport on Packer fans and a long term cancer for the Vikings.

I agree that they're a playoff team without him as well.

But long term cancer? How do you figure that?

Musical chairs at QB may help them next year but lets face it, unless Favre finds the fountain of youth what good is he after that?

Plus if he acts like he did in NY how does that trickle down in the locker room? Nobody likes a prima donna.

Re: Senseless Smac

IHATETHEBEARS — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:06:28 GMT

wisco:
IHATETHEBEARS:

wisco:
No problemo Geno. I agree Favre makes the Vikings better.

Wow. Congrats Wisc. You are officially a minority around here. Only you and I, and another Bear fan or two actually believe this.

It is short term and will hurt them in the long run. They are a playoff team with or without the drama queen viqueen. It is a win/win... he is laying a davenport on Packer fans and a long term cancer for the Vikings.

I agree that they're a playoff team without him as well.

But long term cancer? How do you figure that?

Re: Senseless Smac

geno59 — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:44:14 GMT

wisco:
geno59:
wisco:
geno59:
wisco:
geno59:
wisco:
geno59:
dbears54:
geno59:
Rockdalian:
hmmm i'm wonderin if you even watch football cause i'm thinkin you missed why the broncos lost, do you just look at records and playoffs and say oh well they suck they didn't make the playoffs cause it was broncos defense that lost them almost every game and last time i checked even the bears defense was better than most of the nfl the passed two seasons when they were losing including those worthless broncos now as for the pack they're done beating the bears no more favre to save their I luv my behind and he definatly aint helpin minnesota cutler aint our savior he's one of the keys to open the doorway he's a legit quarterback it doesn't matter what he talks he can complete all those long balls that orton couldn't he wont over throw our receiver by 5 yards like orton did and don't forget the main stay matt forte he's goin to be the reason we got the division this year

Not so Rockdalian-Rodgers did indeed beat the Bears 37-3 last season. Favre had nothing to do with that win.

and he LOST to the bears also...
True but that's not the point. The poster claimed the "Packers were done beating the Bears" without Favre to "save their I luv my behind" but that wasn't so.   Rodgers beat the Bears soundly 37-3 last season which makes his point inaccurate.
Your heroes record vs Lovie Smith also makes his point inaccurate.

huh? Where in his post did he even mention Lovie Smith? Probably refering more to "my heroes" overall record vs the Bears which would indeed be impressive.
"now as for the pack they're done beating the bears no more favre to save their @@@" Geno, please don't tell me that your hero has blinded your eyes too? Since Lovie Smith came to Chicago, Favre (that would be your hero) has been a non factor. end of story. I am torn between wishing he was still in GB and the pure enjoyment I have had listening to him ramble about his hatred for TT and his total Benedict Arnold act towards everything GB. On second thought I can't wait to see him in a MINNESOTA VIKINGS jersey playing at Lameblow... oh what fun that will be. Cheers

Wisc-you're quote still makes no reference or inference to Lovie Smith-none. Also, this whole "Favre hates everything GB" nonsense has been largely exaggerated. Favre may have some bad feelings towards TT and that's understandable. However, he does not hold those feelings towards the fans. He retired and the Packers made a committment towards Rodgers.   End of story. Favre is free to play wherever he wants and the Vikings give him the best chance to win right now. In addition, he knows the system. Some Bear fans despise Brett Favre and that's understandable. He played for us and racked up many great wins against the Bears. Of course, some will hate him and some will respect him for that However, that is neither here or there. He's gone now and I wish him the best of luck in Minnesota minus the games against the Packers. And although he will be wearing a Vikings jersey and playing in Lambeau-he'll also be wearing that same jersey and playing in Chicago. And I wouldn't stand by that old reasoning "but Lovie's record against Favre..."   It will be a brand new ball game and Favre will be giving the Packers as well as the Bears a hard fought game. You'd better hope your team comes out on top as I am with my team. Oh what fun that will be.

Cheers and welcome back.
Geno, you need to read before you respond. I wrote his Benedict Arnold act towards everything GB... not hatred. If you think the only reason he is looking at Minnesota is because they give him the best chance to win now you are like a lost sheep. He wants to be there to stick it to TT. Sorry to break the news to you. If you cannot understand how that translates to the fans of GB then perhaps you should look up the word ego or better yet selfish. Regardless, I am not worried one bit about the drama queen going to Minnesota. I can't wait for the late December game in Chicago if he is still around. Cheers and thanks for the welcome back.

That's your opinion Wisc. I do believe he'd love to stick it to TT and beat the Packers but I don't believe it's his sole reason for coming back. He wants to play and I'm sure he'd love to win another SB. Favre will not be the only player who was released from his team and who wants to beat his former team. Happens all the time. He brought many wins and exciting games to the Packers and for that I'm grateful. What he does for the Vikings is between him and Minnesota. As I said, I wish him well minus the games against GB. Perhaps you aren't worried a bit about him going to Minnesota and that's great. However, I don't believe for a second all fans feel that way. I'm sure many would have rather faced Sage Rosenfels or T-Jack. IMO-Favre makes the Vikings better-not worse and the Vikings are the team to beat as they won the division last year. Time will soon tell how Favre does with Minnesota and how the division ends up. Let the games dictate that.   Cheers

p.s. A little side wager for Sept. 13th Wisc?
No problemo Geno. I agree Favre makes the Vikings better. The way I look at it is when the Vikings go into a season with high expectations they choke. I hate to say but kinda like the Cubs. Favre or no Favre, I am not worried. The only internet wagers I make are sig bets. PM me a bet and I will consider it. Cheers.

Good deal Wisc. I also have a sig bet going with Dinky but we can do one as well. I'm going out of town to the IOLA car show to hunt down parts for my '59 Impala (hence the '59 in my name) and I'll return on Monday. I'll think of something and I'll run it by you then. I'm sure we can agree on something. I'll try not to come up with anything too obnoxious.

Re: Senseless Smac

wisco — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:02:05 GMT

IHATETHEBEARS:
wisco:
No problemo Geno. I agree Favre makes the Vikings better.

Wow. Congrats Wisc. You are officially a minority around here. Only you and I, and another Bear fan or two actually believe this.

It is short term and will hurt them in the long run. They are a playoff team with or without the drama queen viqueen.

It is a win/win... he is laying a davenport on Packer fans and a long term cancer for the Vikings.