Advertisement
 
in Search

A big WR for Cutler

Last post 07-04-2009, 9:09 PM by bearfan25. 25 replies.
Page 1 of 2 (26 items)   1 2 Next >
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  07-04-2009, 11:04 AM 1660283

    A big WR for Cutler

    First off Happy 4th of July to all fellow Americans. Was thinking about a veteran WR acquisition that would benefit the Bears without all the baggage of  pistols and beat up girl friends.  So after alot of research came up with a name.  This player came from:

    1) A good college program ND.
    2) Has not been in trouble with the law.
    3) Is 6-5, 220 and would be a good target for Jay.
    4) Does not have any legal issues or drug problems
    5) The team he is on we have had good trade relations in the past.
    6) Would not cost multiple draft picks and possibly not a high draft pick.

    His name is Maurice Stovall, What do you guys think?
  •  07-04-2009, 11:12 AM 1660290 in reply to 1660283

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    im sure the bears are fielding every offer they can come up with and recieve. as long as it isnt jones plax or marshall im cool
    I didn't come here to start no trouble.
    I'm just here to do the message board shuffle
    Avatars
  •  07-04-2009, 11:29 AM 1660313 in reply to 1660290

    • trx440 is not online. Last active: 07-05-2009, 11:18 AM trx440
    • Top 500 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on 09-01-2006
    • Arizona - Chicago's largest suburb
    • Starter

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    That would be a good start.  Then maybe they could talk Jeff Szamardija into putting his pads back on.  I was told his baseball contract was 3 years baseball exclusive though it was a 5 year deal in total.  I'm not sure and haven't googled it.

    The NFL lost a great talent when he chose baseball.  Plus, he's a Sox fan so he must breakout in hives everytime he puts on his uni.


    I ran out for milk and came home and found 2 future Hall of Famers on my team... Sweeet.

    2009 Chicago White Sox AL Central Champs............ again.

    And good luck to the Cubs...May they go 154-6 and lose in the bottom of the ninth in game 7 on a cold night in October......at Comiskey
  •  07-04-2009, 11:32 AM 1660316 in reply to 1660313

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    trx440:

    That would be a good start.  Then maybe they could talk Jeff Szamardija into putting his pads back on.  I was told his baseball contract was 3 years baseball exclusive though it was a 5 year deal in total.  I'm not sure and haven't googled it.


    The NFL lost a great talent when he chose baseball.  Plus, he's a Sox fan so he must breakout in hives everytime he puts on his uni.



    great idea. good thinkin
    I didn't come here to start no trouble.
    I'm just here to do the message board shuffle
    Avatars
  •  07-04-2009, 11:37 AM 1660327 in reply to 1660316

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    brandon rideau

    R.I.P cristopher wallace A.K,A Biggie smalls

  •  07-04-2009, 12:00 PM 1660358 in reply to 1660283

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    Steelworker:
    First off Happy 4th of July to all fellow Americans. Was thinking about a veteran WR acquisition that would benefit the Bears without all the baggage of  pistols and beat up girl friends.  So after alot of research came up with a name.  This player came from:

    1) A good college program ND.
    2) Has not been in trouble with the law.
    3) Is 6-5, 220 and would be a good target for Jay.
    4) Does not have any legal issues or drug problems
    5) The team he is on we have had good trade relations in the past.
    6) Would not cost multiple draft picks and possibly not a high draft pick.

    His name is Maurice Stovall, What do you guys think?
    Lol I thought you were talking about Jeff Samardzija lol
    20 bucks on who gives up less sacks, I got the bears and avs has the broncos. May the best Oline win.
  •  07-04-2009, 12:02 PM 1660359 in reply to 1660313

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    trx440:

    That would be a good start.  Then maybe they could talk Jeff Szamardija into putting his pads back on.  I was told his baseball contract was 3 years baseball exclusive though it was a 5 year deal in total.  I'm not sure and haven't googled it.


    The NFL lost a great talent when he chose baseball.  Plus, he's a Sox fan so he must breakout in hives everytime he puts on his uni.

    Yeah, I actually thought that was who he was talking about
    20 bucks on who gives up less sacks, I got the bears and avs has the broncos. May the best Oline win.
  •  07-04-2009, 12:34 PM 1660397 in reply to 1660283

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    Steelworker:
    First off Happy 4th of July to all fellow Americans. Was thinking about a veteran WR acquisition that would benefit the Bears without all the baggage of  pistols and beat up girl friends.  So after alot of research came up with a name.  This player came from:

    1) A good college program ND.
    2) Has not been in trouble with the law.
    3) Is 6-5, 220 and would be a good target for Jay.
    4) Does not have any legal issues or drug problems
    5) The team he is on we have had good trade relations in the past.
    6) Would not cost multiple draft picks and possibly not a high draft pick.

    His name is Maurice Stovall, What do you guys think?


    I think this would be a nice pick up for the Bears.
  •  07-04-2009, 12:36 PM 1660401 in reply to 1660327

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    forte+orton:
    brandon rideau
    As bad as our wr's were last BR never got a shot.......and that should tell you what the coaching staff thought of his abilities.
  •  07-04-2009, 12:43 PM 1660405 in reply to 1660283

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    Steelworker:
    First off Happy 4th of July to all fellow Americans. Was thinking about a veteran WR acquisition that would benefit the Bears without all the baggage of  pistols and beat up girl friends.  So after alot of research came up with a name.  This player came from:

    1) A good college program ND.
    2) Has not been in trouble with the law.
    3) Is 6-5, 220 and would be a good target for Jay.
    4) Does not have any legal issues or drug problems
    5) The team he is on we have had good trade relations in the past.
    6) Would not cost multiple draft picks and possibly not a high draft pick.

    His name is Maurice Stovall, What do you guys think?
    Another big wr who is buried on his teams depth chart is Hank Baskett in Philly.   Unlike Stovall, Baskett has done some good things when given the chance to get onto the field during the regular season.
  •  07-04-2009, 1:09 PM 1660430 in reply to 1660405

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    Bears51/40:
    Steelworker:
    First off Happy 4th of July to all fellow Americans. Was thinking about a veteran WR acquisition that would benefit the Bears without all the baggage of  pistols and beat up girl friends.  So after alot of research came up with a name.  This player came from:

    1) A good college program ND.
    2) Has not been in trouble with the law.
    3) Is 6-5, 220 and would be a good target for Jay.
    4) Does not have any legal issues or drug problems
    5) The team he is on we have had good trade relations in the past.
    6) Would not cost multiple draft picks and possibly not a high draft pick.

    His name is Maurice Stovall, What do you guys think?
    Another big wr who is buried on his teams depth chart is Hank Baskett in Philly.   Unlike Stovall, Baskett has done some good things when given the chance to get onto the field during the regular season.


    Hank Baskett would also be a good addition but it will be harder to take him away from Philly. I believe McNabb openly wanted the team to add more weapons for him. They did, but through the draft. So taking an experienced vet from that WR crew would be like going back a few steps.
  •  07-04-2009, 2:58 PM 1660522 in reply to 1660401

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    Bears51/40:
    forte+orton:
    brandon rideau
    As bad as our wr's were last BR never got a shot.......and that should tell you what the coaching staff thought of his abilities.

    thought he did good in Preseason?

    R.I.P cristopher wallace A.K,A Biggie smalls

  •  07-04-2009, 3:06 PM 1660530 in reply to 1660522

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    forte+orton:
    Bears51/40:
    forte+orton:
    brandon rideau
    As bad as our wr's were last BR never got a shot.......and that should tell you what the coaching staff thought of his abilities.

    thought he did good in Preseason?


    Rex looked good in preseason, you can't always go by what they do when it doesn't count
  •  07-04-2009, 3:11 PM 1660536 in reply to 1660283

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    Two words Brandon Rideau

    Chicago Bears 2009 World Champions
    "The Dream is Alive"
  •  07-04-2009, 3:15 PM 1660539 in reply to 1660430

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    j007bond:
    Bears51/40:
    Steelworker:
    First off Happy 4th of July to all fellow Americans. Was thinking about a veteran WR acquisition that would benefit the Bears without all the baggage of  pistols and beat up girl friends.  So after alot of research came up with a name.  This player came from:

    1) A good college program ND.
    2) Has not been in trouble with the law.
    3) Is 6-5, 220 and would be a good target for Jay.
    4) Does not have any legal issues or drug problems
    5) The team he is on we have had good trade relations in the past.
    6) Would not cost multiple draft picks and possibly not a high draft pick.

    His name is Maurice Stovall, What do you guys think?
    Another big wr who is buried on his teams depth chart is Hank Baskett in Philly.   Unlike Stovall, Baskett has done some good things when given the chance to get onto the field during the regular season.


    Hank Baskett would also be a good addition but it will be harder to take him away from Philly. I believe McNabb openly wanted the team to add more weapons for him. They did, but through the draft. So taking an experienced vet from that WR crew would be like going back a few steps.
    Could be, but right now Baskett is the 5th or 6th wr on Philly's depth chart, behind Jackson, Curtis, Avant, Maclin. Reggie Brown, brandon Gibson, and Baskett may be in a camp battle for the last spot or two on the roster.
  •  07-04-2009, 3:40 PM 1660567 in reply to 1660539

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    Bears51/40:
    j007bond:
    Bears51/40:
    Steelworker:
    First off Happy 4th of July to all fellow Americans. Was thinking about a veteran WR acquisition that would benefit the Bears without all the baggage of  pistols and beat up girl friends.  So after alot of research came up with a name.  This player came from:

    1) A good college program ND.
    2) Has not been in trouble with the law.
    3) Is 6-5, 220 and would be a good target for Jay.
    4) Does not have any legal issues or drug problems
    5) The team he is on we have had good trade relations in the past.
    6) Would not cost multiple draft picks and possibly not a high draft pick.

    His name is Maurice Stovall, What do you guys think?
    Another big wr who is buried on his teams depth chart is Hank Baskett in Philly.   Unlike Stovall, Baskett has done some good things when given the chance to get onto the field during the regular season.


    Hank Baskett would also be a good addition but it will be harder to take him away from Philly. I believe McNabb openly wanted the team to add more weapons for him. They did, but through the draft. So taking an experienced vet from that WR crew would be like going back a few steps.
    Could be, but right now Baskett is the 5th or 6th wr on Philly's depth chart, behind Jackson, Curtis, Avant, Maclin. Reggie Brown, brandon Gibson, and Baskett may be in a camp battle for the last spot or two on the roster.


    Well, if that's the case. IMO, we should go for it. Adding a young, experienced and big WR without the baggage would be good. They're no #1 but they can be with Cutler throwing to them. Just like any of our current receivers who could emerge as a #1 with our current QB. Either Baskett or Stovall would do just fine. Although, I would also prefer Baskett. Either of them will complement our current group of WRs well. Imagine Baskett or Stovall together with Hester, Bennett, Iglesias and Knox. That would be a formidable group.
  •  07-04-2009, 3:52 PM 1660583 in reply to 1660283

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    Steelworker:
    First off Happy 4th of July to all fellow Americans. Was thinking about a veteran WR acquisition that would benefit the Bears without all the baggage of  pistols and beat up girl friends.  So after alot of research came up with a name.  This player came from:

    1) A good college program ND.
    2) Has not been in trouble with the law.
    3) Is 6-5, 220 and would be a good target for Jay.
    4) Does not have any legal issues or drug problems
    5) The team he is on we have had good trade relations in the past.
    6) Would not cost multiple draft picks and possibly not a high draft pick.

    His name is Maurice Stovall, What do you guys think?
    brandon marshall with out the tommie talk
  •  07-04-2009, 4:07 PM 1660595 in reply to 1660583

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    I know nothing about Baskett but I live in Tampa and had expected Stovall to becom for them  a good player for the Bucs but he's wasn't really used much.  I can't say whether it was lack of talent or he just wasn't one of Gruden's guys.  Overall, I would entertain the idea but he is just another under-utilized player like Rideau or Mark Bradley.  The Bears would still be "risking". 

     I think "risking", when it comes to wide receivers, is worthwhile. But it seems to be the #1 most-regurgitated crack of the  Bears by columnist, tv analysts, and half of the fan base, and all of the fans of other teams.  Bottom line, we're in no better position moving into the season than we are now, might as well keep what we've got.

  •  07-04-2009, 4:47 PM 1660635 in reply to 1660536

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    BizzyBear06:
    Two words Brandon Rideau


    Baskett or Stovall or Rideau would be fine as far as I'm concerned. If Rideau steps up (which I think he will), then, going for Baskett or Stovall would not be a necessity. I still believe that we're good to go with our current WR corps. I see Hester, Bennett, Iglesias and Knox being very good receivers for us. It would help us a lot though if Brandon Rideau could step up. Him stepping up would give Cutler that big target to throw to at WR. If not, Baskett or Stovall may be able to help us in that department.
  •  07-04-2009, 5:11 PM 1660644 in reply to 1660283

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    Steelworker:
    First off Happy 4th of July to all fellow Americans. Was thinking about a veteran WR acquisition that would benefit the Bears without all the baggage of  pistols and beat up girl friends.  So after alot of research came up with a name.  This player came from:

    1) A good college program ND.
    2) Has not been in trouble with the law.
    3) Is 6-5, 220 and would be a good target for Jay.
    4) Does not have any legal issues or drug problems
    5) The team he is on we have had good trade relations in the past.
    6) Would not cost multiple draft picks and possibly not a high draft pick.

    His name is Maurice Stovall, What do you guys think?
    ya, but can he play ST? Doh!
  •  07-04-2009, 6:53 PM 1660696 in reply to 1660283

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    Steelworker:
    First off Happy 4th of July to all fellow Americans. Was thinking about a veteran WR acquisition that would benefit the Bears without all the baggage of  pistols and beat up girl friends.  So after alot of research came up with a name.  This player came from:

    1) A good college program ND.
    2) Has not been in trouble with the law.
    3) Is 6-5, 220 and would be a good target for Jay.
    4) Does not have any legal issues or drug problems
    5) The team he is on we have had good trade relations in the past.
    6) Would not cost multiple draft picks and possibly not a high draft pick.

    His name is Maurice Stovall, What do you guys think?
    I am a ND fan and loved watching Stovall and Samardjia and would love it if the Bears got one or the other. Though Samardja is out becasue he plays baseball so the leaves Stovall who would be a great possession and red zone threat (he could be the new Marshall ) It shouldn't cost more than a 4-5th round pick either since the Bucs really have little room for him after all of the money they wasted on Clayton and Winslow not to mention Bryant wants more money as well. Though I doubt it will happen since the Bears will be hesitant to trade any more picks away after the 3 for Cutler.
  •  07-04-2009, 6:59 PM 1660701 in reply to 1660283

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    use te davis
  •  07-04-2009, 7:06 PM 1660711 in reply to 1660283

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    Hey the Steelers did alright last year with two 5'11 starting receivers. We should just stick with what we have.

  •  07-04-2009, 7:31 PM 1660725 in reply to 1660711

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    GSHfan:
    Hey the Steelers did alright last year with two 5'11 starting receivers. We should just stick with what we have.
    The Eagles starting receivers weren't very tall, were they?

    Still, a big possession guy can't hurt, even with our tight ends. Rideau might step up, and that would be cool. Baskett or Stovall could be good options. From what I read on Samardjia, I'd love to have him on the team. It's a shame he chose baseball over football.

    "There are only about a dozen NFL quarterbacks with the arm, charisma and willpower to carry a team to the Super Bowl. Cutler is on that list; Kyle Orton is not. Yet the Broncos gave Cutler away to the Bears because he didn’t make a positive first impression on new head coach Josh McDaniels. Franchise quarterbacks are harder to find than Super Bowl coaches. In fact, franchise quarterbacks often make Super Bowl coaches." -Rick Gosselin
  •  07-04-2009, 8:00 PM 1660740 in reply to 1660711

    Re: A big WR for Cutler

    GSHfan:
    Hey the Steelers did alright last year with two 5'11 starting receivers. We should just stick with what we have.

    untill they prove they will be good we are going to continue seeing posts like this, so you may as well get used to it. It is annoying as all heck but that is the way it is.
Page 1 of 2 (26 items)   1 2 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML